Should married women + mothers be allowed to compete at Miss Universe???

Should married women + mothers be allowed to compete at Miss Universe???

Win Your Next Pageant

Get Pageant Questions Written By A Miss Universe Judge








✨ COME SAY HI!
Instagram:
TikTok:
Facebook:
Subscribe:

✨ Subscribe for more videos using this link:

Link to Global Beauties Article:

Watch next: Is Lily a good singer? –

New to my channel? Get to know us here: Lily saves a baby turtle ..(read more at source)



ON SALE: Pageant Resale

PRACTICE: Pageant Questions

VIEW MORE: Miss USA Videos

LEARN ABOUT OTHER: Beauty Pageants

See also  DEBATE MUT VS UIU || MISS UNIVERSE THAILAND 🇹🇭 2022

About the author: Pageant Coach

Related Posts

24 Comments

  1. The name of the contest should be changed, married woman cannot be called Miss, it would sound weird I'm Mrs AB and Miss Universe, management must look into this.

  2. Loved this commentary, Siera! My ultimate bucket-list wish would be for the whole world to adopt the Ms. prefix as the standard for women, (as men just have Mr.)- This way the whole Miss/Mrs. Universe argument would be null and void… A girl can wish!

  3. So that means this pregnant woman will be wearing a swinsuit on stage because that's really inappropriate. This MU Org is becoming a woke organization.

  4. I honestly think they're changing the rules knowing that the new rules really won't change anything, because, in all reality, a lot of women agree with the fact that it WOULD be very hard to juggle marriage and/or kids and compete for Miss USA and/or Miss Universe. This new rule is their way of evolving and aligning with women's equality, but also knowing that a lot of these women won't actually compete. Sounds like corporate is just trying to be "current."

  5. I completely agree. As someone who lives in a country that completely idolises the old school I think MU needed a change. I'm not so certain about pregnant women, where I live I've heard stories of women who were walking and stopped, gave birth, cleaned their baby and kept walking. It is different for everyone. Only that pregnant women knows how much she can handle.

  6. I have been watching Miss Universe since 1979. I was 8 then. It is still the best beauty pageant to date. Prestigious, dignified and of course glamorous beyond words.
    In the last 25 years I travelled to many different countries to watch the pageant live.
    Like everything else, all good things must end. 2022 will be the closing for me for good. I respect MOUs decision but I don't have to agree with them. I lost all interest totally with the latest announcement. Somehow it takes out the fun.
    Just because something is right it isn't always good.

    Thank you Sierra you have done a splendid job. And I seriously think your dress is so beautiful when I witnessed it on the stage at the Mall of Asia compared to how it looked on screen. It didn't do you justice. And your pony tail really accentuated your beautiful sharp features and show off the dress magnificently 🤩.
    Love you always, always.

  7. Well, obviously the people behind this changes of MU are desperate wanna be women who wants to stay relevant!! Grow up and learn to respect traditions!!!

  8. I am not okay with a contestant who are married or having baby. Miss Universe is a huge pageant which pushing a platform who inspired other woman to be who they are. But joining this pageant the you have kids, it's not appropriate and it can ruin the reputation if the pageant general.

  9. When Miss World became progressive and acquiesced to the demands of 70s feminism, it started its slow but sure decline. Miss Universe is basically following the fate of that London=based pageant. If MGI can only be less dictatorial and Supra will continue to improve or just follow the footsteps of pre-2022 Miss Universe, these pageants might end up the more glamorous pageants and possibly over time eclipsing these 2 alpha pageants. Come to think of it, only the Latin American countries, Asia and Africa seem to be the major source of fandom for pageants nowadays and surprisingly still hold conservative values. This inclusivity is a death knell for pageantry as far as those interested and serious followers of pageantry is concerned. Western countries like Europe/USA/Canada have lost interest in pageantry a long time ago and only perhaps the diaspora community and the seniors are those that are making beauty contest still contribute to a following otherwise, it's all kaput. Although MGI has a polarized audience, it seems it has a brighter future as it continues to bring drama and entertainment value akin to the original pageants. Even though I myself detest the way the owner runs his show, I find hope that these 2nd tier pageants will retain and continue promoting these old values and for which the "new followers" from developing countries have shown strong support.

    I think when Siera mentioned about supporting these changes to follow with the times, she must be referring to the Western countries sans LatAm but its following has been diminishing and the biggest support actually comes from developing countries like Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, countries in Africa and the whole of Latin America (perhaps with the exclusion of Argentina/Chile and Uruguay) These countries have conservative values and I am not sure whether these latest pronouncement from MU augurs well with them. Canada where Siera hails from didn't even celebrate their last win in MU. Natalie (is that her name?) would rather work in and around Thailand where her services as a past winner is appreciated rather than in her home country! So, what's the point?!

  10. Surely don't agree with this MUO rules al MUO contestants who to participate know and followed rules. Being married, divorced or pregnant queen not good example for all future queens who prepared and naturally woman with intelligence

  11. I personally think it was best left as the Pageant was . It’s called Miss Universe for a reason . I’m not xenophobic but seriously. It’s such a prestigious title . And whilst I’m at it I think Miss India universe whilst a beautiful capable woman . If she is so unwell as she appears to look she should be gracious and pass the crown on to Miss Paraguay Nadia . I’m an Australian man with a great respect for women . But that’s why we have a runner up . And Nadia was very unlucky not to take the crown .

  12. NO. IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO CALL THE PAGEANT MISS UNIVERSE ANYMORE IF THAT HAPPENS. MISS IS A TITLE GIVEN TO AN UNMARRIED WOMAN or YOUNG WOMAN. Seeing a Miss Universe contestant or its winner is an epitome of young, unmarried, articulate, with universal personality, relatable, an example to younger kids that everything has its own time like getting marry and having kids. Miss Universe is also a job remember that. If you win how you'll devide yourself from your job and family. Sacrificing her family for a year of fame, glamour, and whatever is not worth it losing ayear of your time far from your family, husband and kids. This is basically a selfish decision and that is not a good example of a winner of miss universe if ever a winner has already her own family and kids.

    Let this pageant remain for single ladies who has more time to perform her duty well.

  13. I have a take on the upcoming eligibility expansion of Miss Universe candidates that, to me, is nothing more than a creatively hatched marketing plan for the 71-year-old pageant brand's existential relevance. I think the main change will affect how the chosen queen in 2023 will reign after her coronation. My guess is that, after collecting her prizes, she won't have to stay in the Miss Universe apartment in NYC for a full year anymore – only when she's in the Big Apple for official job assignments, such as when she has to do the press rounds right after winning or to grace a season of the New York Fashion Week as special guest or when she's given the chance to expound and disseminate her personal advocacy in the area.

    As for when she needs to visit other countries – say, to Indonesia for Puteri Indonesia that has become an annual trip for the new Miss U under IMG – why, she can simply hop from her HOME country where she would already have picked up the pieces of her PRE-Miss Universe life WHETHER WITH A HUSBAND and/or CHILD(ren) OR NOT. It would be a life that's imaginably less lonely than what Zozibini Tunzi must have undergone during her time at the height of Covid-19. Being away from the day-to-day organizational tethering, the new queen can reclaim the individual options that she has had to give up during her pageant journey. Her CIVIL (Single/Married/Divorced) and OBSTETRICAL (With Child/ren or Pregnant) statuses should NOT in any way impede the ability of an empowered woman, who has achieved her dream of becoming Miss Universe, in carrying out the duties and responsibilities of the title. For me, I'd definitely love to see the day when the outgoing Miss Universe with a visible belly bump will be able able to crown her successor. It would reestablish and augment her humanity and relatability.

    For the organization, this will mean big savings and less logistical headaches since they won't have to pay for the queen's year-round maintenance and security – only for her travels and accommodations, event-specific wardrobe as well as per-diem allowance, like anyone on a business trip.

    BTW, this queenly ON-CALL arrangement is already being implemented by other top tier and lower tier international platforms, notably Miss International, Miss Supranational, Miss Intercontinental, Miss Globe – although none of these have hopped on the married/divorced/with child(ren) bandwagon . I'm sure that the new MU CEO Amy Emmerich, recently brought in to plump up the Miss Universe coffers, must have noticed.

  14. I agree that Miss Universe should not stick to the old rules, it needs to evolve with the world and society. however, I think it would be a better idea to allow single woman of all age (no age limits) to complete at Miss Universe, instead of allowing women with kids and married to compete. I am not against the women with kids and who are married. but the idea of "Miss" in my society means a lady who is not married nor have a kid. I mean we have no say on this because it is Miss Universe's decision, whether it is a good decision or not, let the history speak for itself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *